“the football factory” is a good movie. well made. great acting. what it doesn’t have is anything actually about football. football is just a side note to how all these guys decide which side to be on for the fighting. the guy that played dog in “lock, stock and two smoking barrels” is one of the main characters. the ending was good. if it was an american movie the ending would have been the opposite. hopefully that doesn’t give anything away for anyone that still wants to see it.
“fever pitch”, on the other hand, is a fantastic movie about football. it should without a doubt be in the top 10%. on second viewing, i would have to rate it as one of my favorites. it’s also cool to see the places you’ve actually been to in person. i’m going to have to make a trip back to highbury. i think something will be lost when arsenal move to emirate stadium.
on a related note, i saw some of the islington midweek league games. i actually missed the one i was going to go to, but they apparently have games every night of the week at this place. it’s probably ~1.5 miles from where i’m staying. i don’t have a t.v. to look at. i think these were in the premier division. the quality was probably about like d1 in birmingham. not much good passing. a lot of long balls to no where. i wasn’t impressed.
it was interesting that they were playing on some horrible looking astroturf. it looked like it had been laid down right on top of asphalt. i wouldn’t expect that there was any real improvement over how soccerblast is. i suspect that it’s difficult to play on grass here for amateur leagues year round. so do you want crappy, bumpy, balding grass or hard astroturf? it might as well be a u.s. presidential election.
unrelated note, why is “the da vinci code” a pound cheaper than “nineteen eighty four”? george orwell has been dead since 1950. ahh, what retarded copyright systems we have. meanwhile, i can get a copy of some old classic like “moby dick” or shakespeare plays for 2 pounds. how does it make since to give a monopoly for a century? actually, it’s probably infinite in the u.s. since disney will just keep getting congress to retro-actively extend everytime mickey mouse (who was stolen) is about to go out of copyright. speaking of, why does it retro-actively change? the whole point of copyright is to induce people to create new works. the work was already created with a known situation that the creator agreed to when he created the work. why should it change? fools.