<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: inductrack, maglev: the next generation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.moopsfc.com/37/2006/04/16/inductrack-maglev-the-next-generation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.moopsfc.com/37/2006/04/16/inductrack-maglev-the-next-generation/</link>
	<description>the continuing saga of your hero</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:00:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: brodie bruce</title>
		<link>http://blog.moopsfc.com/37/2006/04/16/inductrack-maglev-the-next-generation/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>brodie bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.moopsfc.com/37/2006/04/16/inductrack-maglev-the-next-generation/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>the maglev to las vegas was mentioned in one/some of the articles i read. not sure if they were linked. it was supposed to be a private company doing it. california was giving push back because they didn&#039;t want the money leaving the state or something. good to see other places than birmingham (to atlanta) make that stupid argument. i can see a fast non-flight to vegas being desirable for l.a. an atlanta to chattanooga line, boston to d.c. and something in pennsylvania are part of the same bill. it&#039;s just undecided who will get it. you&#039;re actually unfortunate if you do since they&#039;ll all be using the old tech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the maglev to las vegas was mentioned in one/some of the articles i read. not sure if they were linked. it was supposed to be a private company doing it. california was giving push back because they didn&#8217;t want the money leaving the state or something. good to see other places than birmingham (to atlanta) make that stupid argument. i can see a fast non-flight to vegas being desirable for l.a. an atlanta to chattanooga line, boston to d.c. and something in pennsylvania are part of the same bill. it&#8217;s just undecided who will get it. you&#8217;re actually unfortunate if you do since they&#8217;ll all be using the old tech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://blog.moopsfc.com/37/2006/04/16/inductrack-maglev-the-next-generation/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.moopsfc.com/37/2006/04/16/inductrack-maglev-the-next-generation/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>I just read an article about a senator trying to build a maglev train from anaheim to las vegas. It&#039;s obviously a pork project since there probably isn&#039;t a huge need to cart people between the two destinations, and since there appears to be a better solution than maglev, as you noted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read an article about a senator trying to build a maglev train from anaheim to las vegas. It&#8217;s obviously a pork project since there probably isn&#8217;t a huge need to cart people between the two destinations, and since there appears to be a better solution than maglev, as you noted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.moopsfc.com/37/2006/04/16/inductrack-maglev-the-next-generation/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 18:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.moopsfc.com/37/2006/04/16/inductrack-maglev-the-next-generation/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of vactrains. Might help with my travel problems. Why don&#039;t you get on that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of vactrains. Might help with my travel problems. Why don&#8217;t you get on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
